Destiny City? Not to be confused with City of God.

Well I have to say I'm a little disappointed with Bishop Tamaki now. He has pulled a few stunts in the past, I disagree with them on a few points but I've never really had a problem with Destiny church. Alot of people I've talked to don't really like Destiny, and it doesn't help they had so much media attention either. But now I have to say that 'Destiny City' is a step way too far.

Plans for the city include a 5000-seat church, maraes, medical centres and schools - eliminating the need for residents to ever leave.

"Every child of every member of this church will never go to a state school again," Mr Tamaki said.

Honestly I think this is going against what Jesus did on earth. He sat with sinners, talked with women both Jew, Samarian and Gentile. Not to mention he became human in the first place, he entered into our chaotic human world of deceit, violence, corruption, and un-holiness to reach us all. I mean why go through the process of being human to save us? Cause he loves us! He came and spent time with the underdogs, he did not pull away and create a Holy huddle. A crisis within the Church at the moment across the West is it's seperation from culture, Destiny City represents such a movement away from the world. By not engaging the world how are we to spread the Kingdom of God and show people the path to Christ?

Here's an article by Stuff NZ on Destiny City where the above quotes came from.

This is an interesting blog that I think in some form represents what non-believers think of this move. Their talk about creating their own religion, 'biontology,' was a funny read.

Caputo, Deconstruction and Hospitality (Part 2)

This is another observation as I continue reading What Would Jesus Deconstruct? by John Caputo. This post isn't intended to be motivational, but self-evaluative.

I thought John Caputo had some interesting thoughts around hospitality. They have more fully realized that of which I want to be doing more of. Hospitality, Caputo outlines, is simple enough to understand; welcoming the other into our own house. But the ones we really invite over are generally those in whom we enjoy the company of. Perhaps we even expect some future reciprocity. Caputo identifies this as the 'inhospitality in our hospitality.' To be true to the word 'hospitality' would be to welcome any other into our house. I'll let Caputo speak for himself:

"Should [hospitality] not be extended beyond our neighbours to strangers? Beyond friends to our enemies? Beyond the invited to the uninvited? In fact, is not the very act of invitation foreign to the idea of hospitality...isasmuch as "inviting" is a selection process whereby one puts in place in advance a set of prior conditions under which the hospitality will be exercised?...Derrida insists on distinguishing between invititation and visitation: hospitality by invitation is always conditional, a compromised and programmed operation, as opposed to hospitality to the univited other - who pays us an unexpected visit - which is unconditional and unprogrammed." pg 76

I guess one of my hopes is that our place is like a sanctuary, not only to me and my wife, but for others aswell. I find this hard to bring into reality however as I regard our home as a sacred space. It is hard to give up sacred space (and in a sense sacred time) for those in whom you find the company hard. I imagine it gets even harder when kids are in the picture. How many people should we be open to? Is being hospitable also being like a drop-in-zone for the needy? I can imagine this puts serious strain on a family. What sort of boundaries are needed? But I get the point Caputo is making, hospitality is much more than invitation. Perhaps it is translatable to availability, to those that usually go uninvited - like in-laws, unlikable people, troubled adolescents, the putrid smelling homeless - as well as the invited. I think hospitality can be achieved away from the home, by going mountain biking with the troubled adolescent, a drink at a cafe with the in-laws, movie with someone unlikable, or a couple new pieces of clothing and a feed for the homeless. I guess that's the force behind "Love your enemy" and "Love your neighbor as you love yourself." I really feel for the homeless and wish closing the disparate gap between the rich and poor was so much closer. I have often wondered what Jesus meant by saying that he is found in the poor and weak. Caputo finishes his section on hospitality by saying:

"We constantly pray and call for Jesus to come, but the question is...do we really want him to come, or is his true appearance always really uninviting? Is not Jesus showing up the last thing we really want to have - dressed in rags and laying claim to us in all his neediness, as one of the least among us?...Christianity would be well advised to consider itself under the permanent promise/threat of just such a visitation - quite uninvited - by Jesus, who may at any time show up at the doors of our churches, requiring of us an accounting of what we have made of his memory or asking for a cup of cold water - or perhaps an increase in the minimum wage and basic health insurance." pg 78.




Lomography.com

Piha

Well we spent a few hours down at the Piha market this mornin. Was a little disappointed over the size, but there we definitely some interesting stalls there. Maori stuff, stall with cheap second hand tools, trinkets, complex puzzles, food, cool clothin and other stuff. They even had the local Native Indians singing the whole morning.

This is one of the Native Indians trying to sell one of their albums to a passerby.

There was three of four of them with heaps of different instruments. It was quite cool to listen to.

This is a shot down one of the alleys (?). Was quite a busy place. Any how I enjoyed it, I came out with a new wrist thing, puzzle and an Indian bird whistler :).

Hope all are well.

Cheers

Jimmy

Wonder Cream

I came across this cream a little while back and have had to use it again in the last couple of days. It is quite honestly a cream that does about ten different things. It is a wonder I never heard about it til a few months ago. You can use it for soap, moisturizing, help clean minor cuts, rashes, shaving cream, skin agitations. In fact here's a weirdish use, for those of you who suffer from constant nose bleeds (especially during hot nights) you can put a little bit on the inside of your noses and it stops the skin breaking by keeping it moist. For me I have a skin reaction on my shin and it's healing it up good.

On a more theoretical note (I couldn't help but put one in) here is a question. (I'm working from the assumption that vegans don't eat fish here, at least that's what I've been informed).

From a vegan point of view is Jesus eating fish deconstructible?


Well I'm hitting the hay. Off to Piha markets tomorrow morning!

Stay Golden

Philip a.k.a Jimmy

Caputo, Barth and the Church (Part 1)

Well I've almost finished reading a book on Karl Barth, a theologian from last century, and started reading Jack (John) Caputo's, a contemporary philosopher, book What Would Jesus Deconstruct? I have found it interesting the correlation between the two, even though they come from different perspectives. I guess I'll start with Barth and allow the point of this blog to develop.
'In this way Barth [is] giving expression to the idea that Reformed theology is reforming theology. This committment, which arises from the Reformed concern for the ongoing reformation of the faith and practice of the church according to the Word of God in the context of everchanging circumstances and situations, is captured in the saying "The reformed church is always reforming according to the Word of God."...Reformed theology is always reforming according to the Word of God in order to bear witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the context of an ever-changing world characterized be a variety of cultural settings.'

It seems that for Barth God was God, and as such was free to come and go as pleased (he is not suggesting a fickle God). Barth reacted to a God imprisoned within a mere human understanding. As the Word of Scripture is revelation from God himself the church is to continually be reformed by it throughout time. But whatever is understood, must be understood through the revelation of Jesus Christ. I guess what I'm trying to develop here is the notion of Reformed theology as reforming theology.
Introducing....Caputo:

'...the existence of the church is provisional - like a long-term substitute teacher - praying for the kingdom, whose coming Jesus announced and which everyone was expecting woud come sometime soon. But this coming was deferred, and the church occupies the space of the 'deferral,' of the distance or 'difference,' between two comings...in the meantime the church is supposed to do the best it can to bring that kingdom about in itself, here on earth, in a process of incessant self-renewal or auto-deconstruction, while not setting itself up as a bunch of kings and princes. That is why the church is 'deconstructible,' but the kingdom of God, if there is such a thing, is not. The church is a provisional construction, and whatever is constructed is deconstructible.' pg 35.

Here Caputo is calling for a right to deconstruct the church and reveal what lies beneath. As a provisional construction (the church) we are here to present the gospel and by participation in the Spirit enlargen the kingdom of God. And this is where I pick up on Barth. By deconstructing the church, and by subjecting ourselves to the reforming nature of the Word of God and Jesus Christ, we continue to move forward with the culture we are unavoidably a part of. We move forward with the rest of the world, and move forward with our own situations and circumstances and continue to show people the path to Christ. I suggest this as something to consider for anyone who has not considered this yet.

Thus I find myself at the end of the blog, I hope someone somewhere enjoyed this.

Stay Golden

Jimmy

Truth, Christ and the Postmodern World

Well I read Voddie Baucham Jr's paper on Truth and the Supremacy of Christ in a Postmodern World found in the book The Supremacy Of Christ in a Postmodern World (edited by John Piper and Justin Taylor) last night. Through the questions 1) Who am I? 2) Why am I here? 3) What is wrong with the world? and 4) How can what is wrong be made right? he juxtaposes Christian theism with postmodern secular humanism.
Baucham Jr based his Christian theistic answers from Colossians 1:12 - 21. He works consistently from a reformant styled theology and was a good read in that respect. For example 'Who am I? The crown and glory of the creation of God. What is wrong with the world? What is wrong is me.'
In regards to the postmodern worldview he makes some interesting points against the consumer styled society. For example;

'What if we saw our studies as stewardship? What if we raised our children not to go and do something just because it would make us proud but instead raised them so that they would discover the way that God has put them together?...What if we continually taught them to focus on the supremacy of Christ in truth and how he relates to our very purpose for existing?'

However, while making these points it seems his view on postmodernsim is pessimistic and possibly simplistic. He arrives at the conclusion that the postmodern worldview leaves humanity

'empty and hopeless; man is left worthless, and you are left to pursue your own satisfaction and never find it.'

However despite this feeling I enjoyed his analysis of postmodernism more than the Christian theistic break down.
In the end he arrives the anticipated place where Jesus is supreme and the basis for Christian truth. From him we derive our meaning, purpose and a directive. I didn't find much new in the Christian breakdown, but I enjoyed his analysis of the postmodern worldview, despite the pessismistic feeling.

Name Change

Hey

Well we (Briar and I) decided on a name change finally.  Same Stuff Different Day was just a temp name inspired by the movie Dreamcatcher.  It is Kiwi's lowdown cause 1) we're Kiwi's 2) this is where we update on what we're getting up to (this is opposed to updating Facebook status every five minutes which sometimes seems a bit silly) 3) Kiwi-land (New Zealand) is pretty geographically low in the world.  In fact I think we should set Stewart Island up for attractive flights and cruises to the antarctic - which may include glass bottom boats to watch the underwater antarctican wildlife. 4) Also it seems that alot of theological discussion and influence comes from other areas of the world e.g. Germany, Switzerland,England, France, America.  I'm not saying there is none from the NZ, but that most of my reading around current ideas come from offshore people.  If only I had $500,000 to study overseas....

On other news, (as I'm relatively new to the blog scene I am discovering alot of stuff still) I have found a good blog by C Michael Patton on 'Will The Real Emerger Please Stand-Up?' Warning, it is quite lengthy, but it is quite informative on topic of emerging church.  It explains a (the?) relationship between fundamentalism, orthodoxy, evangelicism, emerging and emergent.  Perhaps the most useful for me was how he distinguished the difference between emerging and emergent.  There are other blogs on there bout emerging church, but I haven't had enough time to read them yet. I'm sure they're good.

Chairs

Jimmy

The Temple

Hey peeps

Thought I'd post something and show that I havn't forgotten bout the blog.  Been real busy with assignments.  Got 5 due in next week which I'm workin hard to finish off.  Briars got a big one due in next week as well.  Generally we're doing well though.
Hey it's also our friend Luzettes birthday tomorrow as well.  She does some interesting stuff for Scripture Union so if you want go leave her a strangers 'happy birthday' comment on her blog.

This site has a bit of interesting imagery and info on the temple during Jesus' life on earth. Check it out here if your interested.

Catch you guys laters

Chairs

Jimmy